Short answer, no.
I could have left it at that really, but then I read @silkcharm’s blog post and tweets, and felt I needed to justify it that little more.
Short answer, no.
I could have left it at that really, but then I read @silkcharm’s blog post and tweets, and felt I needed to justify it that little more.
Considering that I’ve seen the vast majority of contenders for this year’s Oscars, I thought I may as well list my predictions [for the categories that I’m somewhat comfortable with, anyway]. Ok, maybe “predictions” is not quite the right word since there’ll be some bias involved, so maybe it’s more my hopes for how the awards get handed out tomorrow. No, I’ll just do both; my predictions and what I actually want to win.
Pardon my stream of consciousness.
Key:
What I predict will win – italics
What I want to win – bold
Performance by an actor in a leading role
Performance by an actor in a supporting role
Performance by an actress in a leading role
Performance by an actress in a supporting role
Best animated feature film of the year
Achievement in art direction
Achievement in cinematography
Best documentary feature
Achievement in film editing
Best foreign language film of the year
Achievement in music written for motion pictures (Original score)
Achievement in visual effects
Adapted screenplay
Original screenplay
Achievement in directing
Best motion picture of the year
The full list of categories and nominees can be found at the official Oscars Nominations page.
Thoughts:
Boy am I glad I watched Shutter Island again. The first viewing, last Thursday, in a terribly inebriated state, resulted in me seeing about 15 minutes of the movie while falling asleep and generally having no idea what the hell was going on. Add to this the not so stellar reviews it’s been getting and I was well within my rights to give it a miss, but the pride I have misplaced in my unofficial movie reviewer role got the better of me.
Firstly, what’s with all the negativity surrounding it?! Scorsese might have bitten off more than he could chew with that ending and the amount of information that was crammed into it, but god damn the journey there was enjoyable. The score was just perfect, with those heavy, jarring violins so beautifully capturing the mood [apparently it sounds Hitchcockian, like Vertigo], and then there’s the imagery.
Every second of that first dream sequence was to die for, and seems so far removed from what I’ve seen of Scorsese. I absolutely loved all the war flashbacks and Ward C scene with Jackie Earle Haley, with an oh-so-creepy Michelle Williams towards the end of the movie. I don’t know if I even need to mention DiCaprio, but good lord he totally owns the movie, churning out another spellbinding performance. Can anyone else really pull this kind of role off?
This thought has been whirling around in my mind ever since I re-watched seasons 4 & 5 of LOST, and last week’s ep [Lighthouse] seemingly added another layer of affirmation. Since I wrote out my theory in a rant-worthy fashion on Google Buzz, during a discussion with @snarkle, I thought I may as well regurgitate it here.
Note: Smokey = Smoke Monster = MiB = Fake Locke = Flocke
Jacob’s Cabin/Circle of ash
The cicle of ash around Jacob’s Cabin is an anti-Smokey mechanism. So, if Smokey’s roaming around the island, the on-island Christian Shephard inside that cabin John Locke sees surely cannot be Smokey.
Claire/Lighthouse
Two quotes from “Lighthouse” sum things up, where Claire seems to make a clear distinction between her father [on-island Christian Shephard] and her friend.
“First my father told me, and then my friend told me” – Claire, when explaining to Jin how she’s so sure The Others have her baby
“That’s not John. This is my friend” – Claire, at the end of the episode when Flocke walks into her camp
What ruins the theory
There’s just one scene that’s stuck with me that ruins this theory. In “Something Nice Back Home”, Jack, working at St. Sebastian hospital hears the smoke alarm beeping and then sees Christian Shephard. At the time, that smoke alarm going off meant only one thing to me, which sort of ruins the theory that they’re separate entities. Unless… there are two Smoke Monsters…
Smokey Candidates
If the two are separate entites, what does it mean? It’s only fair that if Jacob has his candidates, Smokey should be allowed to have some of his own too. Is this what Christian Shephard and Claire Littleton are?
We haven’t seen Claire doing too much for Smokey, but Christian certainly has:
UPDATE:
In retrospect, all I needed to say was, Smokey cannot leave The Island. Jack seeing Christian Shephard in “Something Nice Back Home” either disproves this fact [of which a 0% chance exists], or this is a plot hole.
Dear god, questions, questions and more questions.
Thoughts:
As updates and content flow in real time around the Web, conversations around the content are becoming increasingly fragmented into individual silos. Salmon aims to define a standard protocol for comments and annotations to swim upstream to original update sources — and spawn more commentary in a virtuous cycle. It’s open, decentralized, abuse resistant, and user centric.
That was mythology overload, right there.
Thoughts:
UPDATE:
UPDATE #2:
The Official LOST Audio Podcast: February 22nd, 2010 (19:48)
Executive Producers Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse discuss the numbers, Claire, zombies and the Flash-sideways.
if (FlashDetect.installed) { $(‘flash_embed-CoIDbzuwll’).show(); $(‘quicktime_embed-CoIDbzuwll’).hide(); } else { $(‘quicktime_embed-CoIDbzuwll’).show(); $(‘flash_embed-CoIDbzuwll’).hide(); }
Movie course day 3, and we are back on the road to awesome, with A Single Man.
Every single frame of this movie was so meticulously and beautifully shot, and knowing this was Tom Ford’s directorial debut made it all the more impressive; I guess that’s what happens when a fashion designer directs. Some people thought it was overkill [too many close ups, too much color saturation], but I loved every second of it!
Add to this the large dose of dark humor and a wonderfully depressing cast and story, and you have yourself a great movie.
Oh, I should probably mention what the movie is actually about, but I might as well let Tom Ford do that.
“It is a deeply spiritual story, of one day in the life of a man who cannot see his future. It is a universal tale of coming to terms with the isolation that we all feel, and of the importance of living in the present and understanding that the small things in life are really the big things in life.”
Ok, I have it, it’s running, but an hour or two in, I’m even more confused than I was with Wave.
UPDATE:
I might as well be meta and include the buzzlet [wtb microsyntax kthxbai] about this post and the associated comments.